Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

±³Á¤ Áø´ÜÀ» À§ÇÑ ÇÇ°³±³ÇսɵµÁö¼ö (Overbite Depth Indicator,ODI)ÀÇ »õ·Î¿î Æò°¡

A NEW APPROACH TO USE OVERBITE DEPTH INDICATOR IN ORTHODONTIC DIAGNOSIS

Korean Journal of Orthodontics 1992³â 22±Ç 1È£ p.17 ~ 30
¾ç¿ø½Ä, À念ÀÏ, ±èÅ¿ì,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¾ç¿ø½Ä ( Yang Won-Sik ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°ú±³Á¤Çб³½Ç
À念ÀÏ ( Chang Yong-Il ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°ú±³Á¤Çб³½Ç
±èÅ¿ì ( Kim Tae-Woo ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°ú±³Á¤Çб³½Ç

Abstract


Since 1984, many patients have been treated with Multiloop Edgewise Archwire(MEAW) Technique and diagnosed with ODI(Overbite Depth Indicator) and APDI(Anteroposterior Dysplasia Indicator) by the authors. 234 samples of them were selected randomly for the statistical analysis(age, sex, Angle¡¯s classification, treatment period,, extraction, ODI etc.). Especially, ODI was analysed statistically and its application methods were reviewed. The results ad conclusions were as follows: 1.On the 150 patients with normal overbite, the mean values of Class ¥°,¥±,¥² malocclusion were 67.5¡£, 72.2¡£ and 59.0¡£. They were significantly different on the level of p<0.01. 2.In normal overbite samples, ODI decreased with the increase of APDI and the correlation coefficient was - 0.54.It seems that this result reflects the characteristics of AB to mandibular plane angle. 3.The regression equation was Y=-0.57X+114.64, where X is APDI and Y is ODI. In cases of small or large APDI, it seems to be absurd that the patient¡¯s ODI is compared with the mean ODI to differentiate diagnostically the open bite or deep bite tendency from the normal.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

SCI(E)
KCI
KoreaMed